@article {49677, title = {Evolution of genes and genomes on the Drosophila phylogeny.}, journal = {Nature}, volume = {450}, year = {2007}, month = {2007 Nov 8}, pages = {203-18}, abstract = {

Comparative analysis of multiple genomes in a phylogenetic framework dramatically improves the precision and sensitivity of evolutionary inference, producing more robust results than single-genome analyses can provide. The genomes of 12 Drosophila species, ten of which are presented here for the first time (sechellia, simulans, yakuba, erecta, ananassae, persimilis, willistoni, mojavensis, virilis and grimshawi), illustrate how rates and patterns of sequence divergence across taxa can illuminate evolutionary processes on a genomic scale. These genome sequences augment the formidable genetic tools that have made Drosophila melanogaster a pre-eminent model for animal genetics, and will further catalyse fundamental research on mechanisms of development, cell biology, genetics, disease, neurobiology, behaviour, physiology and evolution. Despite remarkable similarities among these Drosophila species, we identified many putatively non-neutral changes in protein-coding genes, non-coding RNA genes, and cis-regulatory regions. These may prove to underlie differences in the ecology and behaviour of these diverse species.

}, keywords = {Animals, Codon, DNA Transposable Elements, Drosophila, Drosophila Proteins, Evolution, Molecular, Gene Order, Genes, Insect, Genome, Insect, Genome, Mitochondrial, Genomics, Immunity, Multigene Family, Phylogeny, Reproduction, RNA, Untranslated, sequence alignment, Sequence Analysis, DNA, Synteny}, issn = {1476-4687}, doi = {10.1038/nature06341}, author = {Clark, Andrew G and Eisen, Michael B and Smith, Douglas R and Bergman, Casey M and Oliver, Brian and Markow, Therese A and Kaufman, Thomas C and Kellis, Manolis and Gelbart, William and Iyer, Venky N and Pollard, Daniel A and Sackton, Timothy B and Larracuente, Amanda M and Singh, Nadia D and Abad, Jose P and Abt, Dawn N and Adryan, Boris and Aguade, Montserrat and Akashi, Hiroshi and Anderson, Wyatt W and Aquadro, Charles F and Ardell, David H and Arguello, Roman and Artieri, Carlo G and Barbash, Daniel A and Barker, Daniel and Barsanti, Paolo and Batterham, Phil and Batzoglou, Serafim and Begun, Dave and Bhutkar, Arjun and Blanco, Enrico and Bosak, Stephanie A and Bradley, Robert K and Brand, Adrianne D and Brent, Michael R and Brooks, Angela N and Brown, Randall H and Butlin, Roger K and Caggese, Corrado and Calvi, Brian R and Bernardo de Carvalho, A and Caspi, Anat and Castrezana, Sergio and Celniker, Susan E and Chang, Jean L and Chapple, Charles and Chatterji, Sourav and Chinwalla, Asif and Civetta, Alberto and Clifton, Sandra W and Comeron, Josep M and Costello, James C and Coyne, Jerry A and Daub, Jennifer and David, Robert G and Delcher, Arthur L and Delehaunty, Kim and Do, Chuong B and Ebling, Heather and Edwards, Kevin and Eickbush, Thomas and Evans, Jay D and Filipski, Alan and Findeiss, Sven and Freyhult, Eva and Fulton, Lucinda and Fulton, Robert and Garcia, Ana C L and Gardiner, Anastasia and Garfield, David A and Garvin, Barry E and Gibson, Greg and Gilbert, Don and Gnerre, Sante and Godfrey, Jennifer and Good, Robert and Gotea, Valer and Gravely, Brenton and Greenberg, Anthony J and Griffiths-Jones, Sam and Gross, Samuel and Guigo, Roderic and Gustafson, Erik A and Haerty, Wilfried and Hahn, Matthew W and Halligan, Daniel L and Halpern, Aaron L and Halter, Gillian M and Han, Mira V and Heger, Andreas and Hillier, LaDeana and Hinrichs, Angie S and Holmes, Ian and Hoskins, Roger A and Hubisz, Melissa J and Hultmark, Dan and Huntley, Melanie A and Jaffe, David B and Jagadeeshan, Santosh and Jeck, William R and Johnson, Justin and Jones, Corbin D and Jordan, William C and Karpen, Gary H and Kataoka, Eiko and Keightley, Peter D and Kheradpour, Pouya and Kirkness, Ewen F and Koerich, Leonardo B and Kristiansen, Karsten and Kudrna, Dave and Kulathinal, Rob J and Kumar, Sudhir and Kwok, Roberta and Lander, Eric and Langley, Charles H and Lapoint, Richard and Lazzaro, Brian P and Lee, So-Jeong and Levesque, Lisa and Li, Ruiqiang and Lin, Chiao-Feng and Lin, Michael F and Lindblad-Toh, Kerstin and Llopart, Ana and Long, Manyuan and Low, Lloyd and Lozovsky, Elena and Lu, Jian and Luo, Meizhong and Machado, Carlos A and Makalowski, Wojciech and Marzo, Mar and Matsuda, Muneo and Matzkin, Luciano and McAllister, Bryant and McBride, Carolyn S and McKernan, Brendan and McKernan, Kevin and Mendez-Lago, Maria and Minx, Patrick and Mollenhauer, Michael U and Montooth, Kristi and Mount, Stephen M and Mu, Xu and Myers, Eugene and Negre, Barbara and Newfeld, Stuart and Nielsen, Rasmus and Noor, Mohamed A F and O{\textquoteright}Grady, Patrick and Pachter, Lior and Papaceit, Montserrat and Parisi, Matthew J and Parisi, Michael and Parts, Leopold and Pedersen, Jakob S and Pesole, Graziano and Phillippy, Adam M and Ponting, Chris P and Pop, Mihai and Porcelli, Damiano and Powell, Jeffrey R and Prohaska, Sonja and Pruitt, Kim and Puig, Marta and Quesneville, Hadi and Ram, Kristipati Ravi and Rand, David and Rasmussen, Matthew D and Reed, Laura K and Reenan, Robert and Reily, Amy and Remington, Karin A and Rieger, Tania T and Ritchie, Michael G and Robin, Charles and Rogers, Yu-Hui and Rohde, Claudia and Rozas, Julio and Rubenfield, Marc J and Ruiz, Alfredo and Russo, Susan and Salzberg, Steven L and Sanchez-Gracia, Alejandro and Saranga, David J and Sato, Hajime and Schaeffer, Stephen W and Schatz, Michael C and Schlenke, Todd and Schwartz, Russell and Segarra, Carmen and Singh, Rama S and Sirot, Laura and Sirota, Marina and Sisneros, Nicholas B and Smith, Chris D and Smith, Temple F and Spieth, John and Stage, Deborah E and Stark, Alexander and Stephan, Wolfgang and Strausberg, Robert L and Strempel, Sebastian and Sturgill, David and Sutton, Granger and Sutton, Granger G and Tao, Wei and Teichmann, Sarah and Tobari, Yoshiko N and Tomimura, Yoshihiko and Tsolas, Jason M and Valente, Vera L S and Venter, Eli and Venter, J Craig and Vicario, Saverio and Vieira, Filipe G and Vilella, Albert J and Villasante, Alfredo and Walenz, Brian and Wang, Jun and Wasserman, Marvin and Watts, Thomas and Wilson, Derek and Wilson, Richard K and Wing, Rod A and Wolfner, Mariana F and Wong, Alex and Wong, Gane Ka-Shu and Wu, Chung-I and Wu, Gabriel and Yamamoto, Daisuke and Yang, Hsiao-Pei and Yang, Shiaw-Pyng and Yorke, James A and Yoshida, Kiyohito and Zdobnov, Evgeny and Zhang, Peili and Zhang, Yu and Zimin, Aleksey V and Baldwin, Jennifer and Abdouelleil, Amr and Abdulkadir, Jamal and Abebe, Adal and Abera, Brikti and Abreu, Justin and Acer, St Christophe and Aftuck, Lynne and Alexander, Allen and An, Peter and Anderson, Erica and Anderson, Scott and Arachi, Harindra and Azer, Marc and Bachantsang, Pasang and Barry, Andrew and Bayul, Tashi and Berlin, Aaron and Bessette, Daniel and Bloom, Toby and Blye, Jason and Boguslavskiy, Leonid and Bonnet, Claude and Boukhgalter, Boris and Bourzgui, Imane and Brown, Adam and Cahill, Patrick and Channer, Sheridon and Cheshatsang, Yama and Chuda, Lisa and Citroen, Mieke and Collymore, Alville and Cooke, Patrick and Costello, Maura and D{\textquoteright}Aco, Katie and Daza, Riza and De Haan, Georgius and DeGray, Stuart and DeMaso, Christina and Dhargay, Norbu and Dooley, Kimberly and Dooley, Erin and Doricent, Missole and Dorje, Passang and Dorjee, Kunsang and Dupes, Alan and Elong, Richard and Falk, Jill and Farina, Abderrahim and Faro, Susan and Ferguson, Diallo and Fisher, Sheila and Foley, Chelsea D and Franke, Alicia and Friedrich, Dennis and Gadbois, Loryn and Gearin, Gary and Gearin, Christina R and Giannoukos, Georgia and Goode, Tina and Graham, Joseph and Grandbois, Edward and Grewal, Sharleen and Gyaltsen, Kunsang and Hafez, Nabil and Hagos, Birhane and Hall, Jennifer and Henson, Charlotte and Hollinger, Andrew and Honan, Tracey and Huard, Monika D and Hughes, Leanne and Hurhula, Brian and Husby, M Erii and Kamat, Asha and Kanga, Ben and Kashin, Seva and Khazanovich, Dmitry and Kisner, Peter and Lance, Krista and Lara, Marcia and Lee, William and Lennon, Niall and Letendre, Frances and LeVine, Rosie and Lipovsky, Alex and Liu, Xiaohong and Liu, Jinlei and Liu, Shangtao and Lokyitsang, Tashi and Lokyitsang, Yeshi and Lubonja, Rakela and Lui, Annie and MacDonald, Pen and Magnisalis, Vasilia and Maru, Kebede and Matthews, Charles and McCusker, William and McDonough, Susan and Mehta, Teena and Meldrim, James and Meneus, Louis and Mihai, Oana and Mihalev, Atanas and Mihova, Tanya and Mittelman, Rachel and Mlenga, Valentine and Montmayeur, Anna and Mulrain, Leonidas and Navidi, Adam and Naylor, Jerome and Negash, Tamrat and Nguyen, Thu and Nguyen, Nga and Nicol, Robert and Norbu, Choe and Norbu, Nyima and Novod, Nathaniel and O{\textquoteright}Neill, Barry and Osman, Sahal and Markiewicz, Eva and Oyono, Otero L and Patti, Christopher and Phunkhang, Pema and Pierre, Fritz and Priest, Margaret and Raghuraman, Sujaa and Rege, Filip and Reyes, Rebecca and Rise, Cecil and Rogov, Peter and Ross, Keenan and Ryan, Elizabeth and Settipalli, Sampath and Shea, Terry and Sherpa, Ngawang and Shi, Lu and Shih, Diana and Sparrow, Todd and Spaulding, Jessica and Stalker, John and Stange-Thomann, Nicole and Stavropoulos, Sharon and Stone, Catherine and Strader, Christopher and Tesfaye, Senait and Thomson, Talene and Thoulutsang, Yama and Thoulutsang, Dawa and Topham, Kerri and Topping, Ira and Tsamla, Tsamla and Vassiliev, Helen and Vo, Andy and Wangchuk, Tsering and Wangdi, Tsering and Weiand, Michael and Wilkinson, Jane and Wilson, Adam and Yadav, Shailendra and Young, Geneva and Yu, Qing and Zembek, Lisa and Zhong, Danni and Zimmer, Andrew and Zwirko, Zac and Jaffe, David B and Alvarez, Pablo and Brockman, Will and Butler, Jonathan and Chin, CheeWhye and Gnerre, Sante and Grabherr, Manfred and Kleber, Michael and Mauceli, Evan and MacCallum, Iain} } @article {38574, title = {Whole genome comparisons of serotype 4b and 1/2a strains of the food-borne pathogen Listeria monocytogenes reveal new insights into the core genome components of this species}, journal = {Nucleic acids researchNucleic Acids Research}, volume = {32}, year = {2004}, note = {http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15115801?dopt=Abstract}, type = {10.1093/nar/gkh562}, abstract = {The genomes of three strains of Listeria monocytogenes that have been associated with food-borne illness in the USA were subjected to whole genome comparative analysis. A total of 51, 97 and 69 strain-specific genes were identified in L.monocytogenes strains F2365 (serotype 4b, cheese isolate), F6854 (serotype 1/2a, frankfurter isolate) and H7858 (serotype 4b, meat isolate), respectively. Eighty-three genes were restricted to serotype 1/2a and 51 to serotype 4b strains. These strain- and serotype-specific genes probably contribute to observed differences in pathogenicity, and the ability of the organisms to survive and grow in their respective environmental niches. The serotype 1/2a-specific genes include an operon that encodes the rhamnose biosynthetic pathway that is associated with teichoic acid biosynthesis, as well as operons for five glycosyl transferases and an adenine-specific DNA methyltransferase. A total of 8603 and 105 050 high quality single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) were found on the draft genome sequences of strain H7858 and strain F6854, respectively, when compared with strain F2365. Whole genome comparative analyses revealed that the L.monocytogenes genomes are essentially syntenic, with the majority of genomic differences consisting of phage insertions, transposable elements and SNPs.}, keywords = {Base Composition, Chromosomes, Bacterial, DNA Transposable Elements, Food Microbiology, Genes, Bacterial, Genome, Bacterial, Genomics, Listeria monocytogenes, Meat, Open Reading Frames, Physical Chromosome Mapping, Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide, Prophages, Serotyping, Species Specificity, Synteny, virulence}, author = {Nelson, Karen E. and Fouts, Derrick E. and Mongodin, Emmanuel F. and Ravel, Jacques and DeBoy, Robert T. and Kolonay, James F. and Rasko, David A. and Angiuoli, Samuel V. and Gill, Steven R. and Paulsen, Ian T. and Peterson, Jeremy and White, Owen and Nelson, William C. and Nierman, William and Beanan, Maureen J. and Brinkac, Lauren M. and Daugherty, Sean C. and Dodson, Robert J. and Durkin, A. Scott and Madupu, Ramana and Haft, Daniel H. and J. Selengut and Van Aken, Susan and Khouri, Hoda and Fedorova, Nadia and Forberger, Heather and Tran, Bao and Kathariou, Sophia and Wonderling, Laura D. and Uhlich, Gaylen A. and Bayles, Darrell O. and Luchansky, John B. and Fraser, Claire M.} } @article {49699, title = {P element-mediated in vivo deletion analysis of white-apricot: deletions between direct repeats are strongly favored.}, journal = {Genetics}, volume = {136}, year = {1994}, month = {1994 Mar}, pages = {1001-11}, abstract = {

We have isolated and characterized deletions arising within a P transposon, P[hswa], in the presence of P transposase. P[hswa] carries white-apricot (wa) sequences, including a complete copia element, under the control of an hsp70 promoter, and resembles the original wa allele in eye color phenotype. In the presence of P transposase, P[hswa] shows a high overall rate (approximately 3\%) of germline mutations that result in increased eye pigmentation. Of 234 derivatives of P[hswa] with greatly increased eye pigmentation, at least 205 carried deletions within copia. Of these, 201 were precise deletions between the directly repeated 276-nucleotide copia long terminal repeats (LTRs), and four were unique deletions. High rates of transposase-induced precise deletion were observed within another P transposon carrying unrelated 599 nucleotide repeats (yeast 2 mu FLP; recombinase target sites) separated by 5.7 kb. Our observation that P element-mediated deletion formation occurs preferentially between direct repeats suggests general methods for controlling deletion formation.

}, keywords = {Alleles, Animals, Animals, Genetically Modified, Base Sequence, Crosses, Genetic, DNA, DNA Transposable Elements, Drosophila, Eye Color, Female, Genes, Insect, Male, Molecular Sequence Data, Nucleotidyltransferases, PHENOTYPE, Recombination, Genetic, Repetitive Sequences, Nucleic Acid, Sequence Deletion, Transformation, Genetic, Transposases}, issn = {0016-6731}, author = {Kurkulos, M and Weinberg, J M and Roy, D and Mount, S M} } @article {49701, title = {Species-specific signals for the splicing of a short Drosophila intron in vitro.}, journal = {Mol Cell Biol}, volume = {13}, year = {1993}, month = {1993 Feb}, pages = {1104-18}, abstract = {

The effects of branchpoint sequence, the pyrimidine stretch, and intron size on the splicing efficiency of the Drosophila white gene second intron were examined in nuclear extracts from Drosophila and human cells. This 74-nucleotide intron is typical of many Drosophila introns in that it lacks a significant pyrimidine stretch and is below the minimum size required for splicing in human nuclear extracts. Alteration of sequences of adjacent to the 3{\textquoteright} splice site to create a pyrimidine stretch was necessary for splicing in human, but not Drosophila, extracts. Increasing the size of this intron with insertions between the 5{\textquoteright} splice site and the branchpoint greatly reduced the efficiency of splicing of introns longer than 79 nucleotides in Drosophila extracts but had an opposite effect in human extracts, in which introns longer than 78 nucleotides were spliced with much greater efficiency. The white-apricot copia insertion is immediately adjacent to the branchpoint normally used in the splicing of this intron, and a copia long terminal repeat insertion prevents splicing in Drosophila, but not human, extracts. However, a consensus branchpoint does not restore the splicing of introns containing the copia long terminal repeat, and alteration of the wild-type branchpoint sequence alone does not eliminate splicing. These results demonstrate species specificity of splicing signals, particularly pyrimidine stretch and size requirements, and raise the possibility that variant mechanisms not found in mammals may operate in the splicing of small introns in Drosophila and possibly other species.

}, keywords = {Animals, Base Sequence, Cell Nucleus, Consensus Sequence, DNA, DNA Transposable Elements, Drosophila, Drosophila Proteins, Electrophoresis, Polyacrylamide Gel, HeLa Cells, HUMANS, Introns, Molecular Sequence Data, Mutation, Peptide Hydrolases, Proteins, Regulatory Sequences, Nucleic Acid, Retroelements, RNA Splicing, Species Specificity}, issn = {0270-7306}, author = {Guo, M and Lo, P C and Mount, S M} } @article {49703, title = {Polyadenylylation in copia requires unusually distant upstream sequences.}, journal = {Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A}, volume = {88}, year = {1991}, month = {1991 Apr 15}, pages = {3038-42}, abstract = {

Retroviruses and related genetic elements generate terminally redundant RNA products by differential polyadenylylation within a long terminal repeat. Expression of the white-apricot (wa) allele of Drosophila melanogaster, which carries an insertion of the 5.1-kilobase retrovirus-like transposable element copia in a small intron, is influenced by signals within copia. By using this indicator, we have isolated a 518-base-pair deletion, 312 base pairs upstream of the copia polyadenylylation site, that is phenotypically like much larger deletions and eliminates RNA species polyadenylylated in copia. This requirement of distant upstream sequences for copia polyadenylylation has implications for the expression of many genetic elements bearing long terminal repeats.

}, keywords = {Animals, Base Sequence, Blotting, Northern, DNA Transposable Elements, Drosophila melanogaster, Eye Color, Molecular Sequence Data, Oligonucleotides, Polymerase Chain Reaction, Regulatory Sequences, Nucleic Acid, Repetitive Sequences, Nucleic Acid, RNA Processing, Post-Transcriptional, RNA, Messenger}, issn = {0027-8424}, author = {Kurkulos, M and Weinberg, J M and Pepling, M E and Mount, S M} } @article {49705, title = {Characterization of enhancer-of-white-apricot in Drosophila melanogaster.}, journal = {Genetics}, volume = {126}, year = {1990}, month = {1990 Dec}, pages = {1061-9}, abstract = {

The white-apricot (wa) allele differs from the wild-type white gene by the presence of the retrovirus-like transposable element copia within the transcription unit. Most RNAs derived from wa have 3{\textquoteright} termini within this insertion, and only small amounts of structurally normal RNA are produced. The activity of wa is reduced in trans by a semidominant mutation in the gene Enhancer-of-white-apricot (E(wa). Flies that are wa and heterozygous for the enhancer have eyes which are much lighter than the orange-yellow of wa alone while E(wa) homozygotes have white eyes. This semidominant effect on pigmentation is correlated with a corresponding decrease in white RNA having wild type structure, and flies homozygous for E(wa) have increased levels of aberrant RNAs. Three reverant alleles of E(wa) generated by reversion of the dominant enhancer phenotype with gamma radiation are noncomplementing recessive lethals, with death occurring during the larval stage. The effects on wa eye pigmentation of varying doses of the original E(wa) allele, the wild type allele, and the revertant alleles suggest that the original E(wa) allele produces a product that interferes with the activity of the wild type gene and that the revertants are null alleles. We propose that the E(wa) gene product influences the activity of the downstream copia long terminal repeat in 3{\textquoteright} end formation.

}, keywords = {Alleles, Animals, Blotting, Northern, DNA Transposable Elements, Drosophila melanogaster, Eye Color, Female, Heterozygote, Homozygote, Male, Nucleic Acid Hybridization, PHENOTYPE, Poly A, Reproduction, RNA, RNA, Messenger, Transcription, Genetic}, issn = {0016-6731}, author = {Peng, X B and Mount, S M} } @article {49708, title = {Partial revertants of the transposable element-associated suppressible allele white-apricot in Drosophila melanogaster: structures and responsiveness to genetic modifiers.}, journal = {Genetics}, volume = {118}, year = {1988}, month = {1988 Feb}, pages = {221-34}, abstract = {

The eye color phenotype of white-apricot (wa), a mutant allele of the white locus caused by the insertion of the transposable element copia into a small intron, is suppressed by the extragenic suppressor suppressor-of-white-apricot (su(wa] and enhanced by the extragenic enhancers suppressor-of-forked su(f] and Enhancer-of-white-apricot (E(wa]. Derivatives of wa have been analyzed molecularly and genetically in order to correlate the structure of these derivatives with their response to modifiers. Derivatives in which the copia element is replaced precisely by a solo long terminal repeat (sLTR) were generated in vitro and returned to the germline by P-element mediated transformation; flies carrying this allele within a P transposon show a nearly wild-type phenotype and no response to either su(f) or su(wa). In addition, eleven partial phenotypic revertants of wa were analyzed. Of these, one appears to be a duplication of a large region which includes wa, three are new alleles of su(wa), two are sLTR derivatives whose properties confirm results obtained using transformation, and five are secondary insertions into the copia element within wa. One of these, waR84h, differs from wa by the insertion of the most 3{\textquoteright} 83 nucleotides of the I factor. The five insertion derivatives show a variety of phenotypes and modes of interaction with su[f) and su(wa). The eye pigmentation of waR84h is affected by su(f) and E(wa), but not su(wa). These results demonstrate that copia (as opposed to the interruption of white sequences) is essential for the wa phenotype and its response to genetic modifiers, and that there are multiple mechanisms for the alteration of the wa phenotype by modifiers.

}, keywords = {Alleles, Animals, Base Sequence, DNA Transposable Elements, Drosophila melanogaster, Enhancer Elements, Genetic, GENOTYPE, Molecular Sequence Data, Mutation, Suppression, Genetic}, issn = {0016-6731}, author = {Mount, S M and Green, M M and Rubin, G M} } @article {49710, title = {Complete nucleotide sequence of the Drosophila transposable element copia: homology between copia and retroviral proteins.}, journal = {Mol Cell Biol}, volume = {5}, year = {1985}, month = {1985 Jul}, pages = {1630-8}, abstract = {

We have determined the complete nucleotide sequence of the copia element present at the white-apricot allele of the white locus in Drosophila melanogaster. This transposable element is 5,146 nucleotides long and contains a single long open reading frame of 4,227 nucleotides. Analysis of the coding potential of the large open reading frame, which appears to encode a polyprotein, revealed weak homology to a number of retroviral proteins, including a protease, nucleic acid-binding protein, and reverse transcriptase. Better homology existed between another part of the copia open reading frame and a region of the retroviral pol gene recently shown to be distinct from reverse transcriptase and required for the integration of circular DNA forms of the retroviral genome to form proviruses. Comparison of the copia sequence with those of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae transposable element Ty, several vertebrate retroviruses, and the D. melanogaster copia-like element 17.6 showed that Ty was most similar to copia, sharing amino acid sequence homology and organizational features not found in the other genetic elements.

}, keywords = {Amino Acid Sequence, Animals, Base Sequence, Codon, DNA Helicases, DNA Transposable Elements, Drosophila melanogaster, Gene Expression Regulation, Gene Products, gag, Integrases, Repetitive Sequences, Nucleic Acid, Retroviridae, RNA-Directed DNA Polymerase, Viral Envelope Proteins, Viral Proteins}, issn = {0270-7306}, author = {Mount, S M and Rubin, G M} }