@article {49757, title = {Evolutionarily conserved network properties of intrinsically disordered proteins.}, journal = {PLoS One}, volume = {10}, year = {2015}, month = {2015}, pages = {e0126729}, abstract = {

BACKGROUND: Intrinsically disordered proteins (IDPs) lack a stable tertiary structure in isolation. Remarkably, however, a substantial portion of IDPs undergo disorder-to-order transitions upon binding to their cognate partners. Structural flexibility and binding plasticity enable IDPs to interact with a broad range of partners. However, the broader network properties that could provide additional insights into the functional role of IDPs are not known.

RESULTS: Here, we report the first comprehensive survey of network properties of IDP-induced sub-networks in multiple species from yeast to human. Our results show that IDPs exhibit greater-than-expected modularity and are connected to the rest of the protein interaction network (PIN) via proteins that exhibit the highest betweenness centrality and connect to fewer-than-expected IDP communities, suggesting that they form critical communication links from IDP modules to the rest of the PIN. Moreover, we found that IDPs are enriched at the top level of regulatory hierarchy.

CONCLUSION: Overall, our analyses reveal coherent and remarkably conserved IDP-centric network properties, namely, modularity in IDP-induced network and a layer of critical nodes connecting IDPs with the rest of the PIN.

}, keywords = {Animals, Cluster Analysis, Databases, Protein, Drosophila, Drosophila Proteins, Evolution, Molecular, HUMANS, Intrinsically Disordered Proteins, Metabolic Networks and Pathways, Mice, Osmotic Pressure, Protein Interaction Maps, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Saccharomyces cerevisiae Proteins}, issn = {1932-6203}, doi = {10.1371/journal.pone.0126729}, author = {Rangarajan, Nivedita and Kulkarni, Prakash and Hannenhalli, Sridhar} } @article {49739, title = {Distinct Rap1 activity states control the extent of epithelial invagination via α-catenin.}, journal = {Dev Cell}, volume = {25}, year = {2013}, month = {2013 May 13}, pages = {299-309}, abstract = {

Localized cell shape change initiates epithelial folding, while neighboring cell invagination determines the final depth of an epithelial fold. The mechanism that controls the extent of invagination remains unknown. During Drosophila gastrulation, a higher number of cells undergo invagination to form the deep posterior dorsal fold, whereas far fewer cells become incorporated into the initially very similar anterior dorsal fold. We find that a decrease in α-catenin activity causes the anterior fold to invaginate as extensively as the posterior fold. In contrast, constitutive activation of the small GTPase Rap1 restricts invagination of both dorsal folds in an α-catenin-dependent manner. Rap1 activity appears spatially modulated by Rapgap1, whose expression levels are high in the cells that flank the posterior fold but low in the anterior fold. We propose a model whereby distinct activity states of Rap1 modulate α-catenin-dependent coupling between junctions and actin to control the extent of epithelial invagination.

}, keywords = {Actins, alpha Catenin, Animals, Cell Adhesion, Cell Adhesion Molecules, Cell Membrane, Cell Shape, Drosophila, Drosophila Proteins, Embryo, Nonmammalian, Enzyme Activation, Epithelial Cells, Genes, Insect, Green Fluorescent Proteins, GTP Phosphohydrolases, GTPase-Activating Proteins, Intercellular Junctions, RNA Interference, Time factors, Time-Lapse Imaging}, issn = {1878-1551}, doi = {10.1016/j.devcel.2013.04.002}, author = {Wang, Yu-Chiun and Khan, Zia and Wieschaus, Eric F} } @article {49743, title = {Drosophila Src regulates anisotropic apical surface growth to control epithelial tube size.}, journal = {Nat Cell Biol}, volume = {14}, year = {2012}, month = {2012 May}, pages = {518-25}, abstract = {

Networks of epithelial and endothelial tubes are essential for the function of organs such as the lung, kidney and vascular system. The sizes and shapes of these tubes are highly regulated to match their individual functions. Defects in tube size can cause debilitating diseases such as polycystic kidney disease and ischaemia. It is therefore critical to understand how tube dimensions are regulated. Here we identify the tyrosine kinase Src as an instructive regulator of epithelial-tube length in the Drosophila tracheal system. Loss-of-function Src42 mutations shorten tracheal tubes, whereas Src42 overexpression elongates them. Surprisingly, Src42 acts distinctly from known tube-size pathways and regulates both the amount of apical surface growth and, with the conserved formin dDaam, the direction of growth. Quantitative three-dimensional image analysis reveals that Src42- and dDaam-mutant tracheal cells expand more in the circumferential than the axial dimension, resulting in tubes that are shorter in length-but larger in diameter-than wild-type tubes. Thus, Src42 and dDaam control tube dimensions by regulating the direction of anisotropic growth, a mechanism that has not previously been described.

}, keywords = {Animals, Drosophila, Epithelium, src-Family Kinases}, issn = {1476-4679}, doi = {10.1038/ncb2467}, author = {Nelson, Kevin S and Khan, Zia and Moln{\'a}r, Imre and Mih{\'a}ly, J{\'o}zsef and Kaschube, Matthias and Beitel, Greg J} } @article {49745, title = {A computational statistics approach for estimating the spatial range of morphogen gradients.}, journal = {Development}, volume = {138}, year = {2011}, month = {2011 Nov}, pages = {4867-74}, abstract = {

A crucial issue in studies of morphogen gradients relates to their range: the distance over which they can act as direct regulators of cell signaling, gene expression and cell differentiation. To address this, we present a straightforward statistical framework that can be used in multiple developmental systems. We illustrate the developed approach by providing a point estimate and confidence interval for the spatial range of the graded distribution of nuclear Dorsal, a transcription factor that controls the dorsoventral pattern of the Drosophila embryo.

}, keywords = {Animals, Biostatistics, Cleavage Stage, Ovum, Computational Biology, Computer simulation, Drosophila, Drosophila Proteins, Embryo, Nonmammalian, Gene Expression Regulation, Developmental, Genes, Developmental, Imaging, Three-Dimensional, In Situ Hybridization, Fluorescence, Morphogenesis, Osmolar Concentration, Tissue Distribution}, issn = {1477-9129}, doi = {10.1242/dev.071571}, author = {Kanodia, Jitendra S and Kim, Yoosik and Tomer, Raju and Khan, Zia and Chung, Kwanghun and Storey, John D and Lu, Hang and Keller, Philipp J and Shvartsman, Stanislav Y} } @article {49677, title = {Evolution of genes and genomes on the Drosophila phylogeny.}, journal = {Nature}, volume = {450}, year = {2007}, month = {2007 Nov 8}, pages = {203-18}, abstract = {

Comparative analysis of multiple genomes in a phylogenetic framework dramatically improves the precision and sensitivity of evolutionary inference, producing more robust results than single-genome analyses can provide. The genomes of 12 Drosophila species, ten of which are presented here for the first time (sechellia, simulans, yakuba, erecta, ananassae, persimilis, willistoni, mojavensis, virilis and grimshawi), illustrate how rates and patterns of sequence divergence across taxa can illuminate evolutionary processes on a genomic scale. These genome sequences augment the formidable genetic tools that have made Drosophila melanogaster a pre-eminent model for animal genetics, and will further catalyse fundamental research on mechanisms of development, cell biology, genetics, disease, neurobiology, behaviour, physiology and evolution. Despite remarkable similarities among these Drosophila species, we identified many putatively non-neutral changes in protein-coding genes, non-coding RNA genes, and cis-regulatory regions. These may prove to underlie differences in the ecology and behaviour of these diverse species.

}, keywords = {Animals, Codon, DNA Transposable Elements, Drosophila, Drosophila Proteins, Evolution, Molecular, Gene Order, Genes, Insect, Genome, Insect, Genome, Mitochondrial, Genomics, Immunity, Multigene Family, Phylogeny, Reproduction, RNA, Untranslated, sequence alignment, Sequence Analysis, DNA, Synteny}, issn = {1476-4687}, doi = {10.1038/nature06341}, author = {Clark, Andrew G and Eisen, Michael B and Smith, Douglas R and Bergman, Casey M and Oliver, Brian and Markow, Therese A and Kaufman, Thomas C and Kellis, Manolis and Gelbart, William and Iyer, Venky N and Pollard, Daniel A and Sackton, Timothy B and Larracuente, Amanda M and Singh, Nadia D and Abad, Jose P and Abt, Dawn N and Adryan, Boris and Aguade, Montserrat and Akashi, Hiroshi and Anderson, Wyatt W and Aquadro, Charles F and Ardell, David H and Arguello, Roman and Artieri, Carlo G and Barbash, Daniel A and Barker, Daniel and Barsanti, Paolo and Batterham, Phil and Batzoglou, Serafim and Begun, Dave and Bhutkar, Arjun and Blanco, Enrico and Bosak, Stephanie A and Bradley, Robert K and Brand, Adrianne D and Brent, Michael R and Brooks, Angela N and Brown, Randall H and Butlin, Roger K and Caggese, Corrado and Calvi, Brian R and Bernardo de Carvalho, A and Caspi, Anat and Castrezana, Sergio and Celniker, Susan E and Chang, Jean L and Chapple, Charles and Chatterji, Sourav and Chinwalla, Asif and Civetta, Alberto and Clifton, Sandra W and Comeron, Josep M and Costello, James C and Coyne, Jerry A and Daub, Jennifer and David, Robert G and Delcher, Arthur L and Delehaunty, Kim and Do, Chuong B and Ebling, Heather and Edwards, Kevin and Eickbush, Thomas and Evans, Jay D and Filipski, Alan and Findeiss, Sven and Freyhult, Eva and Fulton, Lucinda and Fulton, Robert and Garcia, Ana C L and Gardiner, Anastasia and Garfield, David A and Garvin, Barry E and Gibson, Greg and Gilbert, Don and Gnerre, Sante and Godfrey, Jennifer and Good, Robert and Gotea, Valer and Gravely, Brenton and Greenberg, Anthony J and Griffiths-Jones, Sam and Gross, Samuel and Guigo, Roderic and Gustafson, Erik A and Haerty, Wilfried and Hahn, Matthew W and Halligan, Daniel L and Halpern, Aaron L and Halter, Gillian M and Han, Mira V and Heger, Andreas and Hillier, LaDeana and Hinrichs, Angie S and Holmes, Ian and Hoskins, Roger A and Hubisz, Melissa J and Hultmark, Dan and Huntley, Melanie A and Jaffe, David B and Jagadeeshan, Santosh and Jeck, William R and Johnson, Justin and Jones, Corbin D and Jordan, William C and Karpen, Gary H and Kataoka, Eiko and Keightley, Peter D and Kheradpour, Pouya and Kirkness, Ewen F and Koerich, Leonardo B and Kristiansen, Karsten and Kudrna, Dave and Kulathinal, Rob J and Kumar, Sudhir and Kwok, Roberta and Lander, Eric and Langley, Charles H and Lapoint, Richard and Lazzaro, Brian P and Lee, So-Jeong and Levesque, Lisa and Li, Ruiqiang and Lin, Chiao-Feng and Lin, Michael F and Lindblad-Toh, Kerstin and Llopart, Ana and Long, Manyuan and Low, Lloyd and Lozovsky, Elena and Lu, Jian and Luo, Meizhong and Machado, Carlos A and Makalowski, Wojciech and Marzo, Mar and Matsuda, Muneo and Matzkin, Luciano and McAllister, Bryant and McBride, Carolyn S and McKernan, Brendan and McKernan, Kevin and Mendez-Lago, Maria and Minx, Patrick and Mollenhauer, Michael U and Montooth, Kristi and Mount, Stephen M and Mu, Xu and Myers, Eugene and Negre, Barbara and Newfeld, Stuart and Nielsen, Rasmus and Noor, Mohamed A F and O{\textquoteright}Grady, Patrick and Pachter, Lior and Papaceit, Montserrat and Parisi, Matthew J and Parisi, Michael and Parts, Leopold and Pedersen, Jakob S and Pesole, Graziano and Phillippy, Adam M and Ponting, Chris P and Pop, Mihai and Porcelli, Damiano and Powell, Jeffrey R and Prohaska, Sonja and Pruitt, Kim and Puig, Marta and Quesneville, Hadi and Ram, Kristipati Ravi and Rand, David and Rasmussen, Matthew D and Reed, Laura K and Reenan, Robert and Reily, Amy and Remington, Karin A and Rieger, Tania T and Ritchie, Michael G and Robin, Charles and Rogers, Yu-Hui and Rohde, Claudia and Rozas, Julio and Rubenfield, Marc J and Ruiz, Alfredo and Russo, Susan and Salzberg, Steven L and Sanchez-Gracia, Alejandro and Saranga, David J and Sato, Hajime and Schaeffer, Stephen W and Schatz, Michael C and Schlenke, Todd and Schwartz, Russell and Segarra, Carmen and Singh, Rama S and Sirot, Laura and Sirota, Marina and Sisneros, Nicholas B and Smith, Chris D and Smith, Temple F and Spieth, John and Stage, Deborah E and Stark, Alexander and Stephan, Wolfgang and Strausberg, Robert L and Strempel, Sebastian and Sturgill, David and Sutton, Granger and Sutton, Granger G and Tao, Wei and Teichmann, Sarah and Tobari, Yoshiko N and Tomimura, Yoshihiko and Tsolas, Jason M and Valente, Vera L S and Venter, Eli and Venter, J Craig and Vicario, Saverio and Vieira, Filipe G and Vilella, Albert J and Villasante, Alfredo and Walenz, Brian and Wang, Jun and Wasserman, Marvin and Watts, Thomas and Wilson, Derek and Wilson, Richard K and Wing, Rod A and Wolfner, Mariana F and Wong, Alex and Wong, Gane Ka-Shu and Wu, Chung-I and Wu, Gabriel and Yamamoto, Daisuke and Yang, Hsiao-Pei and Yang, Shiaw-Pyng and Yorke, James A and Yoshida, Kiyohito and Zdobnov, Evgeny and Zhang, Peili and Zhang, Yu and Zimin, Aleksey V and Baldwin, Jennifer and Abdouelleil, Amr and Abdulkadir, Jamal and Abebe, Adal and Abera, Brikti and Abreu, Justin and Acer, St Christophe and Aftuck, Lynne and Alexander, Allen and An, Peter and Anderson, Erica and Anderson, Scott and Arachi, Harindra and Azer, Marc and Bachantsang, Pasang and Barry, Andrew and Bayul, Tashi and Berlin, Aaron and Bessette, Daniel and Bloom, Toby and Blye, Jason and Boguslavskiy, Leonid and Bonnet, Claude and Boukhgalter, Boris and Bourzgui, Imane and Brown, Adam and Cahill, Patrick and Channer, Sheridon and Cheshatsang, Yama and Chuda, Lisa and Citroen, Mieke and Collymore, Alville and Cooke, Patrick and Costello, Maura and D{\textquoteright}Aco, Katie and Daza, Riza and De Haan, Georgius and DeGray, Stuart and DeMaso, Christina and Dhargay, Norbu and Dooley, Kimberly and Dooley, Erin and Doricent, Missole and Dorje, Passang and Dorjee, Kunsang and Dupes, Alan and Elong, Richard and Falk, Jill and Farina, Abderrahim and Faro, Susan and Ferguson, Diallo and Fisher, Sheila and Foley, Chelsea D and Franke, Alicia and Friedrich, Dennis and Gadbois, Loryn and Gearin, Gary and Gearin, Christina R and Giannoukos, Georgia and Goode, Tina and Graham, Joseph and Grandbois, Edward and Grewal, Sharleen and Gyaltsen, Kunsang and Hafez, Nabil and Hagos, Birhane and Hall, Jennifer and Henson, Charlotte and Hollinger, Andrew and Honan, Tracey and Huard, Monika D and Hughes, Leanne and Hurhula, Brian and Husby, M Erii and Kamat, Asha and Kanga, Ben and Kashin, Seva and Khazanovich, Dmitry and Kisner, Peter and Lance, Krista and Lara, Marcia and Lee, William and Lennon, Niall and Letendre, Frances and LeVine, Rosie and Lipovsky, Alex and Liu, Xiaohong and Liu, Jinlei and Liu, Shangtao and Lokyitsang, Tashi and Lokyitsang, Yeshi and Lubonja, Rakela and Lui, Annie and MacDonald, Pen and Magnisalis, Vasilia and Maru, Kebede and Matthews, Charles and McCusker, William and McDonough, Susan and Mehta, Teena and Meldrim, James and Meneus, Louis and Mihai, Oana and Mihalev, Atanas and Mihova, Tanya and Mittelman, Rachel and Mlenga, Valentine and Montmayeur, Anna and Mulrain, Leonidas and Navidi, Adam and Naylor, Jerome and Negash, Tamrat and Nguyen, Thu and Nguyen, Nga and Nicol, Robert and Norbu, Choe and Norbu, Nyima and Novod, Nathaniel and O{\textquoteright}Neill, Barry and Osman, Sahal and Markiewicz, Eva and Oyono, Otero L and Patti, Christopher and Phunkhang, Pema and Pierre, Fritz and Priest, Margaret and Raghuraman, Sujaa and Rege, Filip and Reyes, Rebecca and Rise, Cecil and Rogov, Peter and Ross, Keenan and Ryan, Elizabeth and Settipalli, Sampath and Shea, Terry and Sherpa, Ngawang and Shi, Lu and Shih, Diana and Sparrow, Todd and Spaulding, Jessica and Stalker, John and Stange-Thomann, Nicole and Stavropoulos, Sharon and Stone, Catherine and Strader, Christopher and Tesfaye, Senait and Thomson, Talene and Thoulutsang, Yama and Thoulutsang, Dawa and Topham, Kerri and Topping, Ira and Tsamla, Tsamla and Vassiliev, Helen and Vo, Andy and Wangchuk, Tsering and Wangdi, Tsering and Weiand, Michael and Wilkinson, Jane and Wilson, Adam and Yadav, Shailendra and Young, Geneva and Yu, Qing and Zembek, Lisa and Zhong, Danni and Zimmer, Andrew and Zwirko, Zac and Jaffe, David B and Alvarez, Pablo and Brockman, Will and Butler, Jonathan and Chin, CheeWhye and Gnerre, Sante and Grabherr, Manfred and Kleber, Michael and Mauceli, Evan and MacCallum, Iain} } @article {49684, title = {The Drosophila U1-70K protein is required for viability, but its arginine-rich domain is dispensable.}, journal = {Genetics}, volume = {168}, year = {2004}, month = {2004 Dec}, pages = {2059-65}, abstract = {

The conserved spliceosomal U1-70K protein is thought to play a key role in RNA splicing by linking the U1 snRNP particle to regulatory RNA-binding proteins. Although these protein interactions are mediated by repeating units rich in arginines and serines (RS domains) in vitro, tests of this domain{\textquoteright}s importance in intact multicellular organisms have not been carried out. Here we report a comprehensive genetic analysis of U1-70K function in Drosophila. Consistent with the idea that U1-70K is an essential splicing factor, we find that loss of U1-70K function results in lethality during embryogenesis. Surprisingly, and contrary to the current view of U1-70K function, animals carrying a mutant U1-70K protein lacking the arginine-rich domain, which includes two embedded sets of RS dipeptide repeats, have no discernible mutant phenotype. Through double-mutant studies, however, we show that the U1-70K RS domain deletion no longer supports viability when combined with a viable mutation in another U1 snRNP component. Together our studies demonstrate that while the protein interactions mediated by the U1-70K RS domain are not essential for viability, they nevertheless contribute to an essential U1 snRNP function.

}, keywords = {Amino Acid Sequence, Animals, Animals, Genetically Modified, Arginine, Drosophila, Drosophila Proteins, Molecular Sequence Data, Mutation, Protein Structure, Tertiary, Ribonucleoprotein, U1 Small Nuclear, RNA-Binding Proteins}, issn = {0016-6731}, doi = {10.1534/genetics.104.032532}, author = {Salz, Helen K and Mancebo, Ricardo S Y and Nagengast, Alexis A and Speck, Olga and Psotka, Mitchell and Mount, Stephen M} } @article {49697, title = {Localization of sequences required for size-specific splicing of a small Drosophila intron in vitro.}, journal = {J Mol Biol}, volume = {253}, year = {1995}, month = {1995 Oct 27}, pages = {426-37}, abstract = {

Many introns in Drosophila and other invertebrates are less than 80 nucleotides in length, too small to be recognized by the vertebrate splicing machinery. Comparison of nuclear splicing extracts from human HeLa and Drosophila Kc cells has revealed species-specificity, consistent with the observed size differences. Here we present additional results with the 68 nucleotide fifth intron of the Drosophila myosin heavy chain gene. As observed with the 74 nucleotide second intron of the Drosophila white gene, the wild-type myosin intron is accurately spliced in a homologous extract, and increasing the size by 16 nucleotides both eliminates splicing in the Drosophila extract and allows accurate splicing in the human extract. In contrast to previous results, however, an upstream cryptic 5{\textquoteright} splice site is activated when the wild-type myosin intron is tested in a human HeLa cell nuclear extract, resulting in the removal of a 98 nucleotide intron. The size dependence of splicing in Drosophila extracts is also intron-specific; we noted that a naturally larger (150 nucleotide) intron from the ftz gene is efficiently spliced in Kc cell extracts that do not splice enlarged introns (of 84, 90, 150 or 350 nucleotides) derived from the 74 nucleotide white intron. Here, we have exploited that observation, using a series of hybrid introns to show that a region of 46 nucleotides at the 3{\textquoteright} end of the white intron is sufficient to confer the species-specific size effect. At least two sequence elements within this region, yet distinct from previously described branchpoint and pyrimidine tract signals, are required for efficient splicing of small hybrid introns in vitro.

}, keywords = {Animals, Base Sequence, Cell Line, DNA, Drosophila, Genes, Insect, HeLa Cells, HUMANS, Introns, Molecular Sequence Data, Myosin Heavy Chains, RNA Splicing, Species Specificity}, issn = {0022-2836}, doi = {10.1006/jmbi.1995.0564}, author = {Guo, M and Mount, S M} } @article {49699, title = {P element-mediated in vivo deletion analysis of white-apricot: deletions between direct repeats are strongly favored.}, journal = {Genetics}, volume = {136}, year = {1994}, month = {1994 Mar}, pages = {1001-11}, abstract = {

We have isolated and characterized deletions arising within a P transposon, P[hswa], in the presence of P transposase. P[hswa] carries white-apricot (wa) sequences, including a complete copia element, under the control of an hsp70 promoter, and resembles the original wa allele in eye color phenotype. In the presence of P transposase, P[hswa] shows a high overall rate (approximately 3\%) of germline mutations that result in increased eye pigmentation. Of 234 derivatives of P[hswa] with greatly increased eye pigmentation, at least 205 carried deletions within copia. Of these, 201 were precise deletions between the directly repeated 276-nucleotide copia long terminal repeats (LTRs), and four were unique deletions. High rates of transposase-induced precise deletion were observed within another P transposon carrying unrelated 599 nucleotide repeats (yeast 2 mu FLP; recombinase target sites) separated by 5.7 kb. Our observation that P element-mediated deletion formation occurs preferentially between direct repeats suggests general methods for controlling deletion formation.

}, keywords = {Alleles, Animals, Animals, Genetically Modified, Base Sequence, Crosses, Genetic, DNA, DNA Transposable Elements, Drosophila, Eye Color, Female, Genes, Insect, Male, Molecular Sequence Data, Nucleotidyltransferases, PHENOTYPE, Recombination, Genetic, Repetitive Sequences, Nucleic Acid, Sequence Deletion, Transformation, Genetic, Transposases}, issn = {0016-6731}, author = {Kurkulos, M and Weinberg, J M and Roy, D and Mount, S M} } @article {49701, title = {Species-specific signals for the splicing of a short Drosophila intron in vitro.}, journal = {Mol Cell Biol}, volume = {13}, year = {1993}, month = {1993 Feb}, pages = {1104-18}, abstract = {

The effects of branchpoint sequence, the pyrimidine stretch, and intron size on the splicing efficiency of the Drosophila white gene second intron were examined in nuclear extracts from Drosophila and human cells. This 74-nucleotide intron is typical of many Drosophila introns in that it lacks a significant pyrimidine stretch and is below the minimum size required for splicing in human nuclear extracts. Alteration of sequences of adjacent to the 3{\textquoteright} splice site to create a pyrimidine stretch was necessary for splicing in human, but not Drosophila, extracts. Increasing the size of this intron with insertions between the 5{\textquoteright} splice site and the branchpoint greatly reduced the efficiency of splicing of introns longer than 79 nucleotides in Drosophila extracts but had an opposite effect in human extracts, in which introns longer than 78 nucleotides were spliced with much greater efficiency. The white-apricot copia insertion is immediately adjacent to the branchpoint normally used in the splicing of this intron, and a copia long terminal repeat insertion prevents splicing in Drosophila, but not human, extracts. However, a consensus branchpoint does not restore the splicing of introns containing the copia long terminal repeat, and alteration of the wild-type branchpoint sequence alone does not eliminate splicing. These results demonstrate species specificity of splicing signals, particularly pyrimidine stretch and size requirements, and raise the possibility that variant mechanisms not found in mammals may operate in the splicing of small introns in Drosophila and possibly other species.

}, keywords = {Animals, Base Sequence, Cell Nucleus, Consensus Sequence, DNA, DNA Transposable Elements, Drosophila, Drosophila Proteins, Electrophoresis, Polyacrylamide Gel, HeLa Cells, HUMANS, Introns, Molecular Sequence Data, Mutation, Peptide Hydrolases, Proteins, Regulatory Sequences, Nucleic Acid, Retroelements, RNA Splicing, Species Specificity}, issn = {0270-7306}, author = {Guo, M and Lo, P C and Mount, S M} } @article {49702, title = {Splicing signals in Drosophila: intron size, information content, and consensus sequences.}, journal = {Nucleic Acids Res}, volume = {20}, year = {1992}, month = {1992 Aug 25}, pages = {4255-62}, abstract = {

A database of 209 Drosophila introns was extracted from Genbank (release number 64.0) and examined by a number of methods in order to characterize features that might serve as signals for messenger RNA splicing. A tight distribution of sizes was observed: while the smallest introns in the database are 51 nucleotides, more than half are less than 80 nucleotides in length, and most of these have lengths in the range of 59-67 nucleotides. Drosophila splice sites found in large and small introns differ in only minor ways from each other and from those found in vertebrate introns. However, larger introns have greater pyrimidine-richness in the region between 11 and 21 nucleotides upstream of 3{\textquoteright} splice sites. The Drosophila branchpoint consensus matrix resembles C T A A T (in which branch formation occurs at the underlined A), and differs from the corresponding mammalian signal in the absence of G at the position immediately preceding the branchpoint. The distribution of occurrences of this sequence suggests a minimum distance between 5{\textquoteright} splice sites and branchpoints of about 38 nucleotides, and a minimum distance between 3{\textquoteright} splice sites and branchpoints of 15 nucleotides. The methods we have used detect no information in exon sequences other than in the few nucleotides immediately adjacent to the splice sites. However, Drosophila resembles many other species in that there is a discontinuity in A + T content between exons and introns, which are A + T rich.

}, keywords = {Animals, Base Sequence, Consensus Sequence, Databases, Factual, Drosophila, Introns, Molecular Sequence Data, RNA Splicing, RNA, Messenger, software}, issn = {0305-1048}, author = {Mount, S M and Burks, C and Hertz, G and Stormo, G D and White, O and Fields, C} } @article {49720, title = {Transcription of cloned tRNA and 5S RNA genes in a Drosophila cell free extract.}, journal = {Nucleic Acids Res}, volume = {9}, year = {1981}, month = {1981 Aug 25}, pages = {3907-18}, abstract = {

We describe the preparation of a cell-free extract from Drosophila Kc cells which allows transcription of a variety of cloned eukaryotic RNA polymerase III genes. The extract has low RNA-processing nuclease activity and thus the major products obtained are primary transcripts.

}, keywords = {Animals, Cell-Free System, Cloning, Molecular, Drosophila, In Vitro Techniques, RNA, RNA Polymerase III, RNA, Transfer, Transcription, Genetic, Xenopus laevis}, issn = {0305-1048}, author = {Dingermann, T and Sharp, S and Appel, B and DeFranco, D and Mount, S and Heiermann, R and Pongs, O and S{\"o}ll, D} }