@article {49739, title = {Distinct Rap1 activity states control the extent of epithelial invagination via α-catenin.}, journal = {Dev Cell}, volume = {25}, year = {2013}, month = {2013 May 13}, pages = {299-309}, abstract = {

Localized cell shape change initiates epithelial folding, while neighboring cell invagination determines the final depth of an epithelial fold. The mechanism that controls the extent of invagination remains unknown. During Drosophila gastrulation, a higher number of cells undergo invagination to form the deep posterior dorsal fold, whereas far fewer cells become incorporated into the initially very similar anterior dorsal fold. We find that a decrease in α-catenin activity causes the anterior fold to invaginate as extensively as the posterior fold. In contrast, constitutive activation of the small GTPase Rap1 restricts invagination of both dorsal folds in an α-catenin-dependent manner. Rap1 activity appears spatially modulated by Rapgap1, whose expression levels are high in the cells that flank the posterior fold but low in the anterior fold. We propose a model whereby distinct activity states of Rap1 modulate α-catenin-dependent coupling between junctions and actin to control the extent of epithelial invagination.

}, keywords = {Actins, alpha Catenin, Animals, Cell Adhesion, Cell Adhesion Molecules, Cell Membrane, Cell Shape, Drosophila, Drosophila Proteins, Embryo, Nonmammalian, Enzyme Activation, Epithelial Cells, Genes, Insect, Green Fluorescent Proteins, GTP Phosphohydrolases, GTPase-Activating Proteins, Intercellular Junctions, RNA Interference, Time factors, Time-Lapse Imaging}, issn = {1878-1551}, doi = {10.1016/j.devcel.2013.04.002}, author = {Wang, Yu-Chiun and Khan, Zia and Wieschaus, Eric F} } @article {49677, title = {Evolution of genes and genomes on the Drosophila phylogeny.}, journal = {Nature}, volume = {450}, year = {2007}, month = {2007 Nov 8}, pages = {203-18}, abstract = {

Comparative analysis of multiple genomes in a phylogenetic framework dramatically improves the precision and sensitivity of evolutionary inference, producing more robust results than single-genome analyses can provide. The genomes of 12 Drosophila species, ten of which are presented here for the first time (sechellia, simulans, yakuba, erecta, ananassae, persimilis, willistoni, mojavensis, virilis and grimshawi), illustrate how rates and patterns of sequence divergence across taxa can illuminate evolutionary processes on a genomic scale. These genome sequences augment the formidable genetic tools that have made Drosophila melanogaster a pre-eminent model for animal genetics, and will further catalyse fundamental research on mechanisms of development, cell biology, genetics, disease, neurobiology, behaviour, physiology and evolution. Despite remarkable similarities among these Drosophila species, we identified many putatively non-neutral changes in protein-coding genes, non-coding RNA genes, and cis-regulatory regions. These may prove to underlie differences in the ecology and behaviour of these diverse species.

}, keywords = {Animals, Codon, DNA Transposable Elements, Drosophila, Drosophila Proteins, Evolution, Molecular, Gene Order, Genes, Insect, Genome, Insect, Genome, Mitochondrial, Genomics, Immunity, Multigene Family, Phylogeny, Reproduction, RNA, Untranslated, sequence alignment, Sequence Analysis, DNA, Synteny}, issn = {1476-4687}, doi = {10.1038/nature06341}, author = {Clark, Andrew G and Eisen, Michael B and Smith, Douglas R and Bergman, Casey M and Oliver, Brian and Markow, Therese A and Kaufman, Thomas C and Kellis, Manolis and Gelbart, William and Iyer, Venky N and Pollard, Daniel A and Sackton, Timothy B and Larracuente, Amanda M and Singh, Nadia D and Abad, Jose P and Abt, Dawn N and Adryan, Boris and Aguade, Montserrat and Akashi, Hiroshi and Anderson, Wyatt W and Aquadro, Charles F and Ardell, David H and Arguello, Roman and Artieri, Carlo G and Barbash, Daniel A and Barker, Daniel and Barsanti, Paolo and Batterham, Phil and Batzoglou, Serafim and Begun, Dave and Bhutkar, Arjun and Blanco, Enrico and Bosak, Stephanie A and Bradley, Robert K and Brand, Adrianne D and Brent, Michael R and Brooks, Angela N and Brown, Randall H and Butlin, Roger K and Caggese, Corrado and Calvi, Brian R and Bernardo de Carvalho, A and Caspi, Anat and Castrezana, Sergio and Celniker, Susan E and Chang, Jean L and Chapple, Charles and Chatterji, Sourav and Chinwalla, Asif and Civetta, Alberto and Clifton, Sandra W and Comeron, Josep M and Costello, James C and Coyne, Jerry A and Daub, Jennifer and David, Robert G and Delcher, Arthur L and Delehaunty, Kim and Do, Chuong B and Ebling, Heather and Edwards, Kevin and Eickbush, Thomas and Evans, Jay D and Filipski, Alan and Findeiss, Sven and Freyhult, Eva and Fulton, Lucinda and Fulton, Robert and Garcia, Ana C L and Gardiner, Anastasia and Garfield, David A and Garvin, Barry E and Gibson, Greg and Gilbert, Don and Gnerre, Sante and Godfrey, Jennifer and Good, Robert and Gotea, Valer and Gravely, Brenton and Greenberg, Anthony J and Griffiths-Jones, Sam and Gross, Samuel and Guigo, Roderic and Gustafson, Erik A and Haerty, Wilfried and Hahn, Matthew W and Halligan, Daniel L and Halpern, Aaron L and Halter, Gillian M and Han, Mira V and Heger, Andreas and Hillier, LaDeana and Hinrichs, Angie S and Holmes, Ian and Hoskins, Roger A and Hubisz, Melissa J and Hultmark, Dan and Huntley, Melanie A and Jaffe, David B and Jagadeeshan, Santosh and Jeck, William R and Johnson, Justin and Jones, Corbin D and Jordan, William C and Karpen, Gary H and Kataoka, Eiko and Keightley, Peter D and Kheradpour, Pouya and Kirkness, Ewen F and Koerich, Leonardo B and Kristiansen, Karsten and Kudrna, Dave and Kulathinal, Rob J and Kumar, Sudhir and Kwok, Roberta and Lander, Eric and Langley, Charles H and Lapoint, Richard and Lazzaro, Brian P and Lee, So-Jeong and Levesque, Lisa and Li, Ruiqiang and Lin, Chiao-Feng and Lin, Michael F and Lindblad-Toh, Kerstin and Llopart, Ana and Long, Manyuan and Low, Lloyd and Lozovsky, Elena and Lu, Jian and Luo, Meizhong and Machado, Carlos A and Makalowski, Wojciech and Marzo, Mar and Matsuda, Muneo and Matzkin, Luciano and McAllister, Bryant and McBride, Carolyn S and McKernan, Brendan and McKernan, Kevin and Mendez-Lago, Maria and Minx, Patrick and Mollenhauer, Michael U and Montooth, Kristi and Mount, Stephen M and Mu, Xu and Myers, Eugene and Negre, Barbara and Newfeld, Stuart and Nielsen, Rasmus and Noor, Mohamed A F and O{\textquoteright}Grady, Patrick and Pachter, Lior and Papaceit, Montserrat and Parisi, Matthew J and Parisi, Michael and Parts, Leopold and Pedersen, Jakob S and Pesole, Graziano and Phillippy, Adam M and Ponting, Chris P and Pop, Mihai and Porcelli, Damiano and Powell, Jeffrey R and Prohaska, Sonja and Pruitt, Kim and Puig, Marta and Quesneville, Hadi and Ram, Kristipati Ravi and Rand, David and Rasmussen, Matthew D and Reed, Laura K and Reenan, Robert and Reily, Amy and Remington, Karin A and Rieger, Tania T and Ritchie, Michael G and Robin, Charles and Rogers, Yu-Hui and Rohde, Claudia and Rozas, Julio and Rubenfield, Marc J and Ruiz, Alfredo and Russo, Susan and Salzberg, Steven L and Sanchez-Gracia, Alejandro and Saranga, David J and Sato, Hajime and Schaeffer, Stephen W and Schatz, Michael C and Schlenke, Todd and Schwartz, Russell and Segarra, Carmen and Singh, Rama S and Sirot, Laura and Sirota, Marina and Sisneros, Nicholas B and Smith, Chris D and Smith, Temple F and Spieth, John and Stage, Deborah E and Stark, Alexander and Stephan, Wolfgang and Strausberg, Robert L and Strempel, Sebastian and Sturgill, David and Sutton, Granger and Sutton, Granger G and Tao, Wei and Teichmann, Sarah and Tobari, Yoshiko N and Tomimura, Yoshihiko and Tsolas, Jason M and Valente, Vera L S and Venter, Eli and Venter, J Craig and Vicario, Saverio and Vieira, Filipe G and Vilella, Albert J and Villasante, Alfredo and Walenz, Brian and Wang, Jun and Wasserman, Marvin and Watts, Thomas and Wilson, Derek and Wilson, Richard K and Wing, Rod A and Wolfner, Mariana F and Wong, Alex and Wong, Gane Ka-Shu and Wu, Chung-I and Wu, Gabriel and Yamamoto, Daisuke and Yang, Hsiao-Pei and Yang, Shiaw-Pyng and Yorke, James A and Yoshida, Kiyohito and Zdobnov, Evgeny and Zhang, Peili and Zhang, Yu and Zimin, Aleksey V and Baldwin, Jennifer and Abdouelleil, Amr and Abdulkadir, Jamal and Abebe, Adal and Abera, Brikti and Abreu, Justin and Acer, St Christophe and Aftuck, Lynne and Alexander, Allen and An, Peter and Anderson, Erica and Anderson, Scott and Arachi, Harindra and Azer, Marc and Bachantsang, Pasang and Barry, Andrew and Bayul, Tashi and Berlin, Aaron and Bessette, Daniel and Bloom, Toby and Blye, Jason and Boguslavskiy, Leonid and Bonnet, Claude and Boukhgalter, Boris and Bourzgui, Imane and Brown, Adam and Cahill, Patrick and Channer, Sheridon and Cheshatsang, Yama and Chuda, Lisa and Citroen, Mieke and Collymore, Alville and Cooke, Patrick and Costello, Maura and D{\textquoteright}Aco, Katie and Daza, Riza and De Haan, Georgius and DeGray, Stuart and DeMaso, Christina and Dhargay, Norbu and Dooley, Kimberly and Dooley, Erin and Doricent, Missole and Dorje, Passang and Dorjee, Kunsang and Dupes, Alan and Elong, Richard and Falk, Jill and Farina, Abderrahim and Faro, Susan and Ferguson, Diallo and Fisher, Sheila and Foley, Chelsea D and Franke, Alicia and Friedrich, Dennis and Gadbois, Loryn and Gearin, Gary and Gearin, Christina R and Giannoukos, Georgia and Goode, Tina and Graham, Joseph and Grandbois, Edward and Grewal, Sharleen and Gyaltsen, Kunsang and Hafez, Nabil and Hagos, Birhane and Hall, Jennifer and Henson, Charlotte and Hollinger, Andrew and Honan, Tracey and Huard, Monika D and Hughes, Leanne and Hurhula, Brian and Husby, M Erii and Kamat, Asha and Kanga, Ben and Kashin, Seva and Khazanovich, Dmitry and Kisner, Peter and Lance, Krista and Lara, Marcia and Lee, William and Lennon, Niall and Letendre, Frances and LeVine, Rosie and Lipovsky, Alex and Liu, Xiaohong and Liu, Jinlei and Liu, Shangtao and Lokyitsang, Tashi and Lokyitsang, Yeshi and Lubonja, Rakela and Lui, Annie and MacDonald, Pen and Magnisalis, Vasilia and Maru, Kebede and Matthews, Charles and McCusker, William and McDonough, Susan and Mehta, Teena and Meldrim, James and Meneus, Louis and Mihai, Oana and Mihalev, Atanas and Mihova, Tanya and Mittelman, Rachel and Mlenga, Valentine and Montmayeur, Anna and Mulrain, Leonidas and Navidi, Adam and Naylor, Jerome and Negash, Tamrat and Nguyen, Thu and Nguyen, Nga and Nicol, Robert and Norbu, Choe and Norbu, Nyima and Novod, Nathaniel and O{\textquoteright}Neill, Barry and Osman, Sahal and Markiewicz, Eva and Oyono, Otero L and Patti, Christopher and Phunkhang, Pema and Pierre, Fritz and Priest, Margaret and Raghuraman, Sujaa and Rege, Filip and Reyes, Rebecca and Rise, Cecil and Rogov, Peter and Ross, Keenan and Ryan, Elizabeth and Settipalli, Sampath and Shea, Terry and Sherpa, Ngawang and Shi, Lu and Shih, Diana and Sparrow, Todd and Spaulding, Jessica and Stalker, John and Stange-Thomann, Nicole and Stavropoulos, Sharon and Stone, Catherine and Strader, Christopher and Tesfaye, Senait and Thomson, Talene and Thoulutsang, Yama and Thoulutsang, Dawa and Topham, Kerri and Topping, Ira and Tsamla, Tsamla and Vassiliev, Helen and Vo, Andy and Wangchuk, Tsering and Wangdi, Tsering and Weiand, Michael and Wilkinson, Jane and Wilson, Adam and Yadav, Shailendra and Young, Geneva and Yu, Qing and Zembek, Lisa and Zhong, Danni and Zimmer, Andrew and Zwirko, Zac and Jaffe, David B and Alvarez, Pablo and Brockman, Will and Butler, Jonathan and Chin, CheeWhye and Gnerre, Sante and Grabherr, Manfred and Kleber, Michael and Mauceli, Evan and MacCallum, Iain} } @article {49681, title = {Spliceosomal small nuclear RNA genes in 11 insect genomes.}, journal = {RNA}, volume = {13}, year = {2007}, month = {2007 Jan}, pages = {5-14}, abstract = {

The removal of introns from the primary transcripts of protein-coding genes is accomplished by the spliceosome, a large macromolecular complex of which small nuclear RNAs (snRNAs) are crucial components. Following the recent sequencing of the honeybee (Apis mellifera) genome, we used various computational methods, ranging from sequence similarity search to RNA secondary structure prediction, to search for putative snRNA genes (including their promoters) and to examine their pattern of conservation among 11 available insect genomes (A. mellifera, Tribolium castaneum, Bombyx mori, Anopheles gambiae, Aedes aegypti, and six Drosophila species). We identified candidates for all nine spliceosomal snRNA genes in all the analyzed genomes. All the species contain a similar number of snRNA genes, with the exception of A. aegypti, whose genome contains more U1, U2, and U5 genes, and A. mellifera, whose genome contains fewer U2 and U5 genes. We found that snRNA genes are generally more closely related to homologs within the same genus than to those in other genera. Promoter regions for all spliceosomal snRNA genes within each insect species share similar sequence motifs that are likely to correspond to the PSEA (proximal sequence element A), the binding site for snRNA activating protein complex, but these promoter elements vary in sequence among the five insect families surveyed here. In contrast to the other insect species investigated, Dipteran genomes are characterized by a rapid evolution (or loss) of components of the U12 spliceosome and a striking loss of U12-type introns.

}, keywords = {Animals, Base Sequence, Bees, Computational Biology, Diptera, Evolution, Molecular, Genes, Insect, Genome, Insect, Molecular Sequence Data, Nucleic Acid Conformation, Phylogeny, Promoter Regions, Genetic, RNA Splicing, RNA, Small Nuclear, Sequence Analysis, RNA, Spliceosomes}, issn = {1355-8382}, doi = {10.1261/rna.259207}, author = {Mount, Stephen M and Gotea, Valer and Lin, Chiao-Feng and Hernandez, Kristina and Makalowski, Wojciech} } @article {49686, title = {Sex-lethal splicing autoregulation in vivo: interactions between SEX-LETHAL, the U1 snRNP and U2AF underlie male exon skipping.}, journal = {Development}, volume = {130}, year = {2003}, month = {2003 Feb}, pages = {463-71}, abstract = {

Alternative splicing of the Sex-lethal pre-mRNA has long served as a model example of a regulated splicing event, yet the mechanism by which the female-specific SEX-LETHAL RNA-binding protein prevents inclusion of the translation-terminating male exon is not understood. Thus far, the only general splicing factor for which there is in vivo evidence for a regulatory role in the pathway leading to male-exon skipping is sans-fille (snf), a protein component of the spliceosomal U1 and U2 snRNPs. Its role, however, has remained enigmatic because of questions about whether SNF acts as part of an intact snRNP or a free protein. We provide evidence that SEX-LETHAL interacts with SANS-FILLE in the context of the U1 snRNP, through the characterization of a point mutation that interferes with both assembly into the U1 snRNP and complex formation with SEX-LETHAL. Moreover, we find that SEX-LETHAL associates with other integral U1 snRNP components, and we provide genetic evidence to support the biological relevance of these physical interactions. Similar genetic and biochemical approaches also link SEX-LETHAL with the heterodimeric splicing factor, U2AF. These studies point specifically to a mechanism by which SEX-LETHAL represses splicing by interacting with these key splicing factors at both ends of the regulated male exon. Moreover, because U2AF and the U1 snRNP are only associated transiently with the pre-mRNA during the course of spliceosome assembly, our studies are difficult to reconcile with the current model that proposes that the SEX-LETHAL blocks splicing at the second catalytic step, and instead argue that the SEX-LETHAL protein acts after splice site recognition, but before catalysis begins.

}, keywords = {Alternative Splicing, Amino Acid Sequence, Animals, Animals, Genetically Modified, Drosophila melanogaster, Drosophila Proteins, Exons, Female, Gene Expression Regulation, Developmental, Genes, Insect, Homeostasis, Male, Models, Genetic, Molecular Sequence Data, Nuclear Proteins, Point Mutation, Ribonucleoprotein, U1 Small Nuclear, Ribonucleoproteins, RNA Splicing, RNA-Binding Proteins, Sequence Homology, Amino Acid, Sex Differentiation}, issn = {0950-1991}, author = {Nagengast, Alexis A and Stitzinger, Shane M and Tseng, Chin-Hsiu and Mount, Stephen M and Salz, Helen K} } @article {49692, title = {The genome sequence of Drosophila melanogaster.}, journal = {Science}, volume = {287}, year = {2000}, month = {2000 Mar 24}, pages = {2185-95}, abstract = {

The fly Drosophila melanogaster is one of the most intensively studied organisms in biology and serves as a model system for the investigation of many developmental and cellular processes common to higher eukaryotes, including humans. We have determined the nucleotide sequence of nearly all of the approximately 120-megabase euchromatic portion of the Drosophila genome using a whole-genome shotgun sequencing strategy supported by extensive clone-based sequence and a high-quality bacterial artificial chromosome physical map. Efforts are under way to close the remaining gaps; however, the sequence is of sufficient accuracy and contiguity to be declared substantially complete and to support an initial analysis of genome structure and preliminary gene annotation and interpretation. The genome encodes approximately 13,600 genes, somewhat fewer than the smaller Caenorhabditis elegans genome, but with comparable functional diversity.

}, keywords = {Animals, Biological Transport, Chromatin, Cloning, Molecular, Computational Biology, Contig Mapping, Cytochrome P-450 Enzyme System, DNA Repair, DNA Replication, Drosophila melanogaster, Euchromatin, Gene Library, Genes, Insect, Genome, Heterochromatin, Insect Proteins, Nuclear Proteins, Protein Biosynthesis, Sequence Analysis, DNA, Transcription, Genetic}, issn = {0036-8075}, author = {Adams, M D and Celniker, S E and Holt, R A and Evans, C A and Gocayne, J D and Amanatides, P G and Scherer, S E and Li, P W and Hoskins, R A and Galle, R F and George, R A and Lewis, S E and Richards, S and Ashburner, M and Henderson, S N and Sutton, G G and Wortman, J R and Yandell, M D and Zhang, Q and Chen, L X and Brandon, R C and Rogers, Y H and Blazej, R G and Champe, M and Pfeiffer, B D and Wan, K H and Doyle, C and Baxter, E G and Helt, G and Nelson, C R and Gabor, G L and Abril, J F and Agbayani, A and An, H J and Andrews-Pfannkoch, C and Baldwin, D and Ballew, R M and Basu, A and Baxendale, J and Bayraktaroglu, L and Beasley, E M and Beeson, K Y and Benos, P V and Berman, B P and Bhandari, D and Bolshakov, S and Borkova, D and Botchan, M R and Bouck, J and Brokstein, P and Brottier, P and Burtis, K C and Busam, D A and Butler, H and Cadieu, E and Center, A and Chandra, I and Cherry, J M and Cawley, S and Dahlke, C and Davenport, L B and Davies, P and de Pablos, B and Delcher, A and Deng, Z and Mays, A D and Dew, I and Dietz, S M and Dodson, K and Doup, L E and Downes, M and Dugan-Rocha, S and Dunkov, B C and Dunn, P and Durbin, K J and Evangelista, C C and Ferraz, C and Ferriera, S and Fleischmann, W and Fosler, C and Gabrielian, A E and Garg, N S and Gelbart, W M and Glasser, K and Glodek, A and Gong, F and Gorrell, J H and Gu, Z and Guan, P and Harris, M and Harris, N L and Harvey, D and Heiman, T J and Hernandez, J R and Houck, J and Hostin, D and Houston, K A and Howland, T J and Wei, M H and Ibegwam, C and Jalali, M and Kalush, F and Karpen, G H and Ke, Z and Kennison, J A and Ketchum, K A and Kimmel, B E and Kodira, C D and Kraft, C and Kravitz, S and Kulp, D and Lai, Z and Lasko, P and Lei, Y and Levitsky, A A and Li, J and Li, Z and Liang, Y and Lin, X and Liu, X and Mattei, B and McIntosh, T C and McLeod, M P and McPherson, D and Merkulov, G and Milshina, N V and Mobarry, C and Morris, J and Moshrefi, A and Mount, S M and Moy, M and Murphy, B and Murphy, L and Muzny, D M and Nelson, D L and Nelson, D R and Nelson, K A and Nixon, K and Nusskern, D R and Pacleb, J M and Palazzolo, M and Pittman, G S and Pan, S and Pollard, J and Puri, V and Reese, M G and Reinert, K and Remington, K and Saunders, R D and Scheeler, F and Shen, H and Shue, B C and Sid{\'e}n-Kiamos, I and Simpson, M and Skupski, M P and Smith, T and Spier, E and Spradling, A C and Stapleton, M and Strong, R and Sun, E and Svirskas, R and Tector, C and Turner, R and Venter, E and Wang, A H and Wang, X and Wang, Z Y and Wassarman, D A and Weinstock, G M and Weissenbach, J and Williams, S M and Worley, K C and Wu, D and Yang, S and Yao, Q A and Ye, J and Yeh, R F and Zaveri, J S and Zhan, M and Zhang, G and Zhao, Q and Zheng, L and Zheng, X H and Zhong, F N and Zhong, W and Zhou, X and Zhu, S and Zhu, X and Smith, H O and Gibbs, R A and Myers, E W and Rubin, G M and Venter, J C} } @article {49696, title = {Genetic enhancement of RNA-processing defects by a dominant mutation in B52, the Drosophila gene for an SR protein splicing factor.}, journal = {Mol Cell Biol}, volume = {15}, year = {1995}, month = {1995 Nov}, pages = {6273-82}, abstract = {

SR proteins are essential for pre-mRNA splicing in vitro, act early in the splicing pathway, and can influence alternative splice site choice. Here we describe the isolation of both dominant and loss-of-function alleles of B52, the gene for a Drosophila SR protein. The allele B52ED was identified as a dominant second-site enhancer of white-apricot (wa), a retrotransposon insertion in the second intron of the eye pigmentation gene white with a complex RNA-processing defect. B52ED also exaggerates the mutant phenotype of a distinct white allele carrying a 5{\textquoteright} splice site mutation (wDR18), and alters the pattern of sex-specific splicing at doublesex under sensitized conditions, so that the male-specific splice is favored. In addition to being a dominant enhancer of these RNA-processing defects, B52ED is a recessive lethal allele that fails to complement other lethal alleles of B52. Comparison of B52ED with the B52+ allele from which it was derived revealed a single change in a conserved amino acid in the beta 4 strand of the first RNA-binding domain of B52, which suggests that altered RNA binding is responsible for the dominant phenotype. Reversion of the B52ED dominant allele with X rays led to the isolation of a B52 null allele. Together, these results indicate a critical role for the SR protein B52 in pre-mRNA splicing in vivo.

}, keywords = {Alleles, Amino Acid Sequence, Animals, Base Sequence, DNA Primers, Drosophila melanogaster, Drosophila Proteins, Frameshift Mutation, Genes, Dominant, Genes, Insect, Molecular Sequence Data, Nuclear Proteins, Phosphoproteins, Point Mutation, Protein Structure, Tertiary, Proteins, RNA Splicing, RNA-Binding Proteins, Sequence Deletion, Sex Determination Analysis}, issn = {0270-7306}, author = {Peng, X and Mount, S M} } @article {49697, title = {Localization of sequences required for size-specific splicing of a small Drosophila intron in vitro.}, journal = {J Mol Biol}, volume = {253}, year = {1995}, month = {1995 Oct 27}, pages = {426-37}, abstract = {

Many introns in Drosophila and other invertebrates are less than 80 nucleotides in length, too small to be recognized by the vertebrate splicing machinery. Comparison of nuclear splicing extracts from human HeLa and Drosophila Kc cells has revealed species-specificity, consistent with the observed size differences. Here we present additional results with the 68 nucleotide fifth intron of the Drosophila myosin heavy chain gene. As observed with the 74 nucleotide second intron of the Drosophila white gene, the wild-type myosin intron is accurately spliced in a homologous extract, and increasing the size by 16 nucleotides both eliminates splicing in the Drosophila extract and allows accurate splicing in the human extract. In contrast to previous results, however, an upstream cryptic 5{\textquoteright} splice site is activated when the wild-type myosin intron is tested in a human HeLa cell nuclear extract, resulting in the removal of a 98 nucleotide intron. The size dependence of splicing in Drosophila extracts is also intron-specific; we noted that a naturally larger (150 nucleotide) intron from the ftz gene is efficiently spliced in Kc cell extracts that do not splice enlarged introns (of 84, 90, 150 or 350 nucleotides) derived from the 74 nucleotide white intron. Here, we have exploited that observation, using a series of hybrid introns to show that a region of 46 nucleotides at the 3{\textquoteright} end of the white intron is sufficient to confer the species-specific size effect. At least two sequence elements within this region, yet distinct from previously described branchpoint and pyrimidine tract signals, are required for efficient splicing of small hybrid introns in vitro.

}, keywords = {Animals, Base Sequence, Cell Line, DNA, Drosophila, Genes, Insect, HeLa Cells, HUMANS, Introns, Molecular Sequence Data, Myosin Heavy Chains, RNA Splicing, Species Specificity}, issn = {0022-2836}, doi = {10.1006/jmbi.1995.0564}, author = {Guo, M and Mount, S M} } @article {49699, title = {P element-mediated in vivo deletion analysis of white-apricot: deletions between direct repeats are strongly favored.}, journal = {Genetics}, volume = {136}, year = {1994}, month = {1994 Mar}, pages = {1001-11}, abstract = {

We have isolated and characterized deletions arising within a P transposon, P[hswa], in the presence of P transposase. P[hswa] carries white-apricot (wa) sequences, including a complete copia element, under the control of an hsp70 promoter, and resembles the original wa allele in eye color phenotype. In the presence of P transposase, P[hswa] shows a high overall rate (approximately 3\%) of germline mutations that result in increased eye pigmentation. Of 234 derivatives of P[hswa] with greatly increased eye pigmentation, at least 205 carried deletions within copia. Of these, 201 were precise deletions between the directly repeated 276-nucleotide copia long terminal repeats (LTRs), and four were unique deletions. High rates of transposase-induced precise deletion were observed within another P transposon carrying unrelated 599 nucleotide repeats (yeast 2 mu FLP; recombinase target sites) separated by 5.7 kb. Our observation that P element-mediated deletion formation occurs preferentially between direct repeats suggests general methods for controlling deletion formation.

}, keywords = {Alleles, Animals, Animals, Genetically Modified, Base Sequence, Crosses, Genetic, DNA, DNA Transposable Elements, Drosophila, Eye Color, Female, Genes, Insect, Male, Molecular Sequence Data, Nucleotidyltransferases, PHENOTYPE, Recombination, Genetic, Repetitive Sequences, Nucleic Acid, Sequence Deletion, Transformation, Genetic, Transposases}, issn = {0016-6731}, author = {Kurkulos, M and Weinberg, J M and Roy, D and Mount, S M} }