Synthetic dosage lethality in the human metabolic network is highly predictive of tumor growth and cancer patient survival.

TitleSynthetic dosage lethality in the human metabolic network is highly predictive of tumor growth and cancer patient survival.
Publication TypeJournal Articles
Year of Publication2015
AuthorsMegchelenbrink W, Katzir R, Lu X, Ruppin E, Notebaart RA
JournalProc Natl Acad Sci U S A
Date Published2015 Sep 14
ISSN1091-6490
Abstract

Synthetic dosage lethality (SDL) denotes a genetic interaction between two genes whereby the underexpression of gene A combined with the overexpression of gene B is lethal. SDLs offer a promising way to kill cancer cells by inhibiting the activity of SDL partners of activated oncogenes in tumors, which are often difficult to target directly. As experimental genome-wide SDL screens are still scarce, here we introduce a network-level computational modeling framework that quantitatively predicts human SDLs in metabolism. For each enzyme pair (A, B) we systematically knock out the flux through A combined with a stepwise flux increase through B and search for pairs that reduce cellular growth more than when either enzyme is perturbed individually. The predictive signal of the emerging network of 12,000 SDLs is demonstrated in five different ways. (i) It can be successfully used to predict gene essentiality in shRNA cancer cell line screens. Moving to clinical tumors, we show that (ii) SDLs are significantly underrepresented in tumors. Furthermore, breast cancer tumors with SDLs active (iii) have smaller sizes and (iv) result in increased patient survival, indicating that activation of SDLs increases cancer vulnerability. Finally, (v) patient survival improves when multiple SDLs are present, pointing to a cumulative effect. This study lays the basis for quantitative identification of cancer SDLs in a model-based mechanistic manner. The approach presented can be used to identify SDLs in species and cell types in which "omics" data necessary for data-driven identification are missing.

DOI10.1073/pnas.1508573112
Alternate JournalProc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.
PubMed ID26371301